Showing posts with label MANMOHAN SINGH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MANMOHAN SINGH. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

‘Move SC for CBI Inquiry into Saradha Chit Fund Scam’ : CPI(M) LEADERS SUBMIT MEMO TO PM

Surjyokanta Mishra, leader of opposition, West Bengal assembly and Sitaram Yechury, leader, CPI(M) Group, Rajya Sabha met the prime minister Dr Manmohan Singh on October 7 and submitted the following memorandum concerning financial fraud by certain financial companies/chit funds in the state of West Bengal. A copy has been sent to union minister of corporate affairs, Sachin Pilot also.

KINDLY refer to our letter of May 9, 2013 regarding the alarming financial irregularities of Saradha Group, the reply letter of June 2, 2013 of Union Minister of State for Finance (Expenditure and Financial Services), and our subsequent letter on July 15, 2013 pointing out inadequacy of action on the part of central government against this financial scam.

This inadequacy has now resulted in a situation where despite the massive fraud by this Saradha Group, with closing down of all its offices and default on repayment of at least 17 lakh depositors, no action has yet been taken on the part of the SEBI and the government of West Bengal to attach the properties of this Saradha Group and for arranging, in a legally appropriate manner, disposal of these  properties for repayment of dues to the depositors. Instead, without having any Constitutional and legal basis and in deviation from the order of the Calcutta High Court (July 26, 2013 page 70), the state government has just allotted and also released a sum of Rs 50 crore from the State budgetary resource as grant to the Inquiry Commission recently, set up by the state government itself, for starting payment to a section of depositors (Memo issued by the Home Department, September 23, 2013).  Providing such grant for compensation instead of disposal of assets of the Saradha Group is again violation of terms of reference (No. 8) of the Inquiry Commission itself (Gazette Notification April 24, 2013).

Under these circumstances, we urge upon you to intervene in this matter so that payment to all depositors is made with adequate promptness, by attaching the properties of Saradha Group in accordance with law and as also directed by the SEBI (April 23, 2013) and not by giving grant through the Commission which is not legal, as mentioned above. This process should start immediately with focus on attachment and disposal of properties, along with punishment for the offending Group.

For completing the entire process, a comprehensive list of properties, including the `benami’ properties, would be essential.  Since this Saradha Group reportedly has properties in several states as well as abroad and since states like Tripura, Odisha and Assam affected by the activities of this Group, have already decided to involve CBI, the government of India should immediately move the Supreme Court, by joining a litigation already being heard in the Apex Court in this matter, in favour of intervention of CBI for investigation under the order as well as supervision of the Supreme Court. It would be appropriate to forge coordination between the efforts of CBI with those of SFIO and ED and also the state agencies, when required.

Of late, there have been reported allegations by one Trinamul Congress (AITC) Member of Parliament  against another AITC MP for having irregular financial relation with this Saradha Group. These are all the more reasons for immediate induction of CBI for inquiry with overall supervision of the Supreme Court for reasons of neutrality.

Similar action should be initiated by the government of India regarding other financial groups/chit funds where frauds have been detected by SEBI or SFIO, with punishment for the offending companies and beginning the process of attachment of properties and disposal in a lawful manner for compensation of the depositors.


Along with the campaign at all levels against the activities of these irregular companies, it is also important for government of India to bring back the attractiveness of small saving schemes and to  take more expeditious steps for spreading banking network in West Bengal and in several other states.

Friday, May 10, 2013

West Bengal Left Front Memorandum to Prime Minister



Thursday, May 9, 2013

A delegation of the Left Front of West Bengal met the Prime Minister Shri Manmohan Singh on May 9, 2013 urging for a neutral, fair and high level investigation into the massive fraud of committed by the Saradha Group of companies and also the return of thousands of crores  of rupees to all the affected depositors immediately. The delegation comprised of five MPs and 6 MLAs and the former Finance Minister of West Bengal, whose names are appended in the memorandum.  The delegation will also be meeting the President. The copy of the memorandum presented to the Hon’ble Prime Minister is given below.

********
Dr. Manmohan Singh
Hon’ble Prime Minister of India
New Delhi.

Hon’ble Prime Minister,

Please refer to the Memorandum submitted to you on August 22, 2011 by the Left Front Legislative Party in West Bengal as well as the Memorandum placed before you on December 19, 2012 by the Left Front Members of Parliament, drawing your kind attention to the alarming problem of irregularities being committed by certain financial companies (so-called ‘Chit Funds’ in terms of local parlance in West Bengal) and requesting for an urgent action by the Central Government. Unfortunately, however, no timely intervention was made by the Central Government and the present State Government. As a result, a massive fraud has been committed by an irregular financial company (Saradha Group) by suddenly closing down all its offices and resulting in a widespread default on repayment to lakhs and lakhs of depositors, belonging mostly to the poorer sections in rural and urban areas of West Bengal. Employees in the print and electronic media owned or controlled by this Saradha Group have also lost their jobs due to this sudden closing down. There has been, due to the misdeeds of this company and similar other companies as well as  the Central policy of making small saving schemes less attractive and commission of the agents reduced, a severe fall in the small savings collection in the State - from Rs. 8,409 crore of net collection of small savings in Post Offices of West Bengal in the last financial year ( 2010-2011) of the Left Front Government to   (-) Rs. 987 crore in the next year ( 2011-2012) and to (-) Rs. 165 crore in 2012-2013 ( up to December), adversely affecting the State as well as the small savings agents.

 You are kindly aware that among the different types of financial companies, there is one category of companies which raise deposits from the people, invest the  money and promise returns  in terms of interest, etc. These companies are required to register with the Registrar of Companies       (ROC) under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs of the Central Government, and then also obtain permission from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and function by obeying the guidelines of RBI. If there is any violation of these guidelines, then the RBI can take necessary actions, including stoppage of work of the concerned companies. There is another category of financial companies which raise funds from the people in terms of share/debentures, and then invest the money in various ventures, including real estate, hotels, television channels, newspapers, entertainment business etc., with promise of returns in terms of lands, apartments, etc. These companies are again to register first with ROC and then get approval from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under the Union Finance Ministry, and obey the guidelines of SEBI. If the guidelines are flouted, then SEBI can take action in terms of prohibiting the activities of the concerned companies. The Saradha Group belongs to this second category. It may be noted in the context that the State Government does not have any role in giving approval of these companies.

 Grave financial irregularities are committed by both these two categories of companies when they violate the guidelines of RBI or SEBI, as the case may be, by alluring promises in terms of false and unrealizable offers of interest or returns. There is usually a period after which these returns are to be paid back to the depositors. In the intervening period, the concerned companies keep on raising funds and often make very partial payment, and then suddenly close their activities without any notice, thus cheating the common people in a large scale as has been the case with the Saradha Group, as  mentioned above.

Under the circumstances, the State Government, within its limited power, can take action if any written complaint of being cheated is obtained, by immediately arresting the proprietors of the concerned companies, attaching all of their properties and then arranging through the Hon’ble Court, the sale of the properties for repaying back to the affected depositors. If there is no written complaint, even then the State Government can conduct enquiry on its own and submit the findings to the concerned Central Agencies (SEBI or RBI) for taking necessary action.  The State Government can also pass a Bill in the State Assembly for Presidential assent for implementing the Act, so as to take necessary action at the very initial stage of the offence in terms of decentralized administrative and legal framework in the districts.

 The Left Front Government in West Bengal had, during its tenure, taken all these actions. In 1980- 81, when some large financial companies had started cheating people, the State Government, on the basis of written complaint, took exemplary action by  arresting the heads of the  concerned companies and then attaching their properties for beginning the process of repayment through the Hon’ble Court. When again in 1991- 92, several companies had cheated people, the State Government in the Finance Department and the Home Department (involving both  Kolkata Police and District Police),  on the basis of written complaint, took prompt action by arresting heads of nearly 96 companies, attaching their properties (both movable and immovable, including bank accounts) and then starting  a Public Interest Litigation  on its own in the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court with a verdict for selling the attached properties through the Court - appointed special officer for beginning the process of repayment of money to the depositors. In the year 2002- 2003, when about 17 companies had cheated people, the heads of all of these companies were arrested, again on the basis of written complaints, and a process of prompt repayment was undertaken. Along with taking those steps, the Left Front Government had also introduced in 2003-2004 a bill (namely, the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2003) for taking early preventive and punishable action against irregular financial companies with a decentralized framework as mentioned before. However after repeated exchange of views and urging by the State Government, when a much delayed Central response (although  for substantially similar bills for several other State Governments, Presidential assent was accorded with more promptness) was obtained in August, 2009 with Presidential message for a few changes, these changes were promptly incorporated and a new bill (The West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Bill, 2009)  was introduced and passed unanimously (with TMC MLAs also present) in the State Assembly on December  22, 2009. The new Bill was then sent for Presidential assent. However the Presidential assent, despite reminders, could not be obtained during the tenure of the Left Front Government.

It needs to be mentioned that from 2008 - 09, a new feature emerged when several companies within jurisdiction of SEBI had started operating in a manner which created apprehension of cheating of people.  However, no written complaint of cheating was received by the State Government. The Left Front Government, therefore, started enquiry on its own involving jointly the Finance Department and Home Department (in terms of Kolkata Police and District Police) and then submitted its findings concerning four relatively big companies (including Saradha Group) to SEBI for necessary action. For the Saradha Group, the attention-drawing letter was sent by the Left Front Government on August 23, 2010. We now find that after closing down of offices of Saradha Group that SEBI has recently issued an instruction on April 23, 2013 on the Saradha Group to pay back to the depositors within a period of three months and with prohibition on taking any further deposit. Although this is a step in the right direction, it has been much too delayed.

 It is also noted with serious concern that we still do not know about any follow-up action by the TMC-led State Government regarding the enquiries started by the Left Front Government into the affairs of four companies mentioned above. We do not know because despite our specific queries, no answer was given in the State Assembly. Moreover, when a discussion on this issue was proposed on December 11, 2012 two Left Front MLAs (including one lady tribal MLA) were beaten up. We also do not know what action was taken by the TMC- led State Government on the 2009 Bill which was unanimously passed in the Assembly (with TMC MLAs present) for Presidential assent in the first twenty months of its existence. We now find that on the basis of a communication from OSD & ED Special Secretary to the Governor of West Bengal to the Secretary to the West Bengal Legislative assembly a motion was passed in the Assembly to withdraw the bill. The aforesaid communication reads:  The Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India has now returned the aforesaid Bill, considering it to be withdrawn by the Government of West Bengal as it has been decided to recast the Bill in order to strengthen it for the purpose of protecting the interest of the depositors in Financial Establishments. This appears to be a clear violation of legislative power of the State Assembly, since prior approval of the Assembly was not taken by the present State Government before sending its views to the Centre for return of the bill, 2009. Moreover, in terms of the communication mentioned above, the following sentence in Sl. No. 6 in the statement of object and reasons of this new bill seems confusing:  It has been advised by the Government of India to withdraw the said Bill. Then, with only a few changes in the 2009 Bill, the new Bill has been passed in the Assembly and sent for Presidential assent. We also find that some of these changes were not necessary and there is also a possibility of further complications and delay.  We suggested a remedial amendment to this new Bill, and a quicker course of action which was not accepted. After raising our anxiety about further delay which may be caused by this bill, we did not however stand on the way of passing of the bill. We want an early action on the part of Hon’ble President in terms of Article 201 of the Constitution.  

Meanwhile, the sufferings of depositors remain unattended.  We therefore urge upon you for considering the following actions:

(1) As several states are involved in this massive fraud of Saradha Group, CBI should immediately be involved in the investigation of this fraud under supervision of appropriate Hon’ble Court.

Since SEBI is the nodal Central agency, and the recent verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (2012) clearly directs SEBI to be the agency for necessary action, SEBI should also be instructed in coordination with CBI and  SFIO to move into this Saradha case immediately, for a proper and  comprehensive investigation into the total list of properties (including different forms of illegal transfers) for immediate attachment and for moving the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as Hon’ble Kolkata High Court for selling of the properties needed  for repayment to the depositors without delay, and also for exemplary punishment for the offending persons.

This entire process of investigation and attachment should be, for reasons of neutrality and fairness, under the appropriate supervision of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Calcutta High Court.

(2) Where there are reasons for anxiety regarding other financial companies in the State, joint action as mentioned about, may be undertaken immediately for correcting the practices of these financial companies for preventing further damages.

(3) National small saving schemes should be immediately restored by the Central Government to their previous status of attractiveness, with simultaneous restoration of commission of agents by both the Centre and the State Government.

(4)  Along with the highest priority on refund of depositors’ money, attention may be given from the national level for a massive programme of an economic reconstruction of the lives of affected depositors (small and marginal farmers, small and tiny entrepreneurs,  traders etc.) in terms of soft loans from the nationalized banks to the willing persons as well as rejuvenating the movement of Self-Help Groups in the State and democratically elected co-operatives (now rendered inoperative in the State) so that this massive loss can be transformed into a programme of reconstruction for growth of production and employment.

There is also  a need for paying attention to problems of journalists, performers and others connected with the closing  down of newspapers and TV channels in terms of inducting new entrepreneurs (without any link with irregular financial companies), or in terms of helping formation of co-operative of employees through assistance including soft loan.

(5) An all-out democratic and decentralized campaign should be started immediately among the affected people for convincing them to stay away from these irregular financial companies and to keep their savings, among others, specially in post office small saving schemes, nationalized banks and co-operative banks.

With regards,

Sd/-
Surjya Kanta Mishra
Leader of the Delegation & Leader of the
Opposition in West Bengal Assembly

Asim Dasgupta,
Former Finance Minister, West Bengal

Sitaram Yechury, MP
Basudev Acharia, MP
Barun Mukherjee, MP
Manohar Tirkey, MP
Probodh Panda, MP
Subhas Naskar, MLA
Paresh Adhikary, MLA
Prabodh Chandra Sinha, MLA
Anadamoy Mondal, MLA
Chand Mohammed, MLA 

Saturday, September 1, 2012

West Bengal Left Front Govt’s Stand On Allocation of Coal Blocks


The prime minister in his written statement laid on the table of both the Houses of Parliament amidst din, said, amongst other things, that the Left Front government in West Bengal had opposed the auction process for allocation of coal mines. This is a distortion of facts. We are reproducing below a note on this entire matter that explains the stand of the CPI(M)-led Left Front government on this matter.

IN the context of the shift of strategy of the Coal India Limited (CIL) and its subsidiaries on the issue of mining of coal in the public sector, the central government took a policy decision in the mid 2000s to open up the coal sector to the private players in keeping with its policy framework to deregulate and privatise – a departure from the hitherto-followed-policy to strengthen the public sector in overall national interest. The policy of the central government was essentially tailored on the recommendations of the Hoda Committee, which the Left Front government had found detrimental to the growth of domestic industries.

With the ‘Policy Resolution on Industries, 1994’ in place, the Left Front government was mandated to achieve its Eleventh Plan objectives with focus on the core sectors like power and steel. Keeping this perspective in view and fully sensing the unfolding realities, the Left Front government requested the  central government to allocate Coal Blocks, which the Coal India Limited and its subsidiaries were not inclined to mine, to the state government to meet the industrial requirements of the state.

The union coal secretary vide his letter No. 13016/18/2005-CA.1 dated 21st September 2005 wrote to the chief secretary to the government of West Bengal  that “the central government is considering allocation of suitable Coal Blocks to state government undertakings /companies through government route provided that the state undertakings/ companies, i.e. Mineral Development Corporation /Power Utilities etc. are authorised to undertake coal mining in terms of the provisions of their Memorandum and Articles of Association .”

Subsequently, the central government constituted a Screening Committee with union coal secretary as chairman where representatives of various state governments were invited for discussion and decision on the allocation of Coal Blocks after examining the applications received from the state governments as well as from the private entities. So far as the Left Front government of West Bengal is concerned, it  requested the central government from time to time to allocate  20 Coal Blocks in favour of the West Bengal Mineral Development and Trading Corporation (WBMDTC)/ West Bengal Power Development Corporation Ltd (WBPDCL), under State Dispensation route through Screening Committee mechanism. The state government vide Commerce & Industries’ Department letter No. 10694 /Pr.S/C&I dated 18th June, 2007 submitted a list of 20 Coal Blocks (all located within the territorial boundary of West Bengal) for allocation.

It is to be noted in this connection that the Trans Damodar and Ichhapur Coal Blocks had already been allotted by the central government in favour of WBMDTC on 14.01.2005 and 02.08.2006 respectively. 

LF GOVT OPPOSED PRIVATE PLAYERS

Again, the state government through chief secretary’s letter No. 314-CS/2007 dated 24th October 2007 explained the state government’s perspective for allocation of Coal Blocks under State Dispensation route as well its concern against central government’s preference for the private players which constituted a marked departure from central government’s own policy as communicated vide No. 38035/2/97-CA dated 12th  December 2001 and No. 13016/18/2005-CA.1 dated 21st September 2005.

The  state government further vide chief secretary’s DO letter No. 314-CS dated 24th October 2007 wrote: “One of the options to meet… the requirements of coal for … the projects is, of course, to ensure availability through Coal India Ltd., and particularly Eastern Coalfields Limited (ECL) and Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL). However, during our discussion with representatives of CIL, ECL and BCCL, it transpired that the present availability of coking and non-coking coal with these companies do not permit them to meet these additional requirements even in the foreseeable future.

“The second option, therefore, is to ensure availability of coal to these new projects through exploration and mining of virgin coal blocks recently put up for allocation by your ministry. But, at the same time, the state government is opposed to the idea of direct allocation of such coal blocks to these companies to guard against chances of diversion, non-utilisation/part utilisation and related unforeseen possibilities. The state government would like the West Bengal Mineral Development and Trading Corporation Ltd (WBMDTC), which is a fully state government owned corporation for mining and trading operations, to operate these new Blocks for meeting the requirement of new greenfield steel and power projects in the state.

“To our surprise, however, it has been observed that the Coal Screening Committee recommended allocation of such Coal Blocks to private companies in spite of specific recommendation of the state government that such Coal Blocks should be allocated only to WBMDTC. The recent recommendation of the Screening Committee on Gourangdih ABC may kindly be referred to. The state government is also unable to understand as to why private companies are being recommended for allocation of Coal Blocks which have been specifically earmarked for State dispensation/ government company route. In fact, all the 20 that we have previously requested for allocation to WBMDTC – all being to this specific category of State dispensation /government company route, we strongly feel that private companies should not be given access to Coal Blocks which have been earmarked for the State dispensation route. Another point raised by the Screening Committee in its meeting is that WBMDTC had in itself not applied for allocation of these Coal Blocks. Since WBMDTC is only a subsidiary corporation under the state government and since the state government as the principal body has specifically requested for allocation of Coal Blocks to WBMDTC as early as December 2006 and January 2007, we feel that the issue of WBMDTC having not itself applied for these Blocks is not relevant. The state government strongly opposes any allocation of Coal Blocks to any private company particularly those which are earmarked for State dispensation /government company route.”

The state government further stated to the central government vide chief secretary’s DO letter No. 107-CS/2008 dated 8th February 2008 that “the state government is fully conscious of the paucity of coal which is a useful industry raw material and the need for its optimal utilisation. Accordingly, our whole effort is directed to providing fillip to the coal mining process simultaneously through WBMDTC and private efforts, and at the same time, boost the industrial resurgence of the state.”

VIEWS ON THE NEW LEGISLATION

In 2008, the central government came up with a new legislative intent seeking to replace the existing Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The state government vide  principal secretary, Commerce & Industries, Department’s DO letter No. 2247/Pr.S dated 10th August 2009 communicated its views on the Draft MM (DR) Act 2009. A few changes were suggested. It was spelt out in the letter that the views of the state government as presented in the meeting convened by the central government in Delhi on August 10, 2009 would form part of the suggested changes. Among the views presented by the representative of the state government attending the said meeting in Delhi, the following  points deserve special mention.

“While competitive bidding for transparent and rational allocation process is a principle that cannot be faulted, the proposition neither defines the role of the states nor safeguards their interests. In fact, with this proposal the legal position, already tilted in favor of the central government, gets further distorted. Therefore, the state government urges that the power to invite applications to grant of mining lease should be devolved on the state government. However, while doing so, the qualifications of the applicants must be clearly defined and the bidding process must assign appropriate weights to the investments on account of value addition, end-use and improvement of infrastructure in the mineral bearing area.”

It was further communicated to the government of India that if the government of India persists with its proposal of vesting itself with the powers in the extant Act under the proposed amendment, the state government’s serious reservations against the proposition can be enumerated as given below:

i.                                            The Screening Committee route confers on the state governments the onus and freedom of making recommendations on the basis of value additions the end-use proponents desire to make. Despite the New Mineral Policy actively encouraging value additions, competitive bidding route will curtail such possibilities drastically, skewing further the imbalance between exploitation of mining reserves and captive mining. Needless to say, the two locations of captive mining and end-use project may not be co-terminus in the proposed regime.

ii.                                          Fast-track exploration needs, envisioned in the New Mineral Policy 2008 (NMP), would require simplified procedure to facilitate establishment of mineral reserves and inventory preparation by deploying state-of-the-art techniques, technology and equipment. This proposal militates against NMP’s stipulation of involving the private sector in a scientific and speedy prospecting and exploration process, given the Standing Committee’s caveat of only explored blocks being put to such competitive bidding. As per available information out of 17,300 sq. km of potential coal bearing area in the country, until the end of Tenth Plan, only 11,865 sq. km area has been regionally/promotionally explored. To cite a state-specific example, in West Bengal out of the total coal resource forecast of GSI of 28.32 billion tonnes, only 11.65 billion tonnes are in the proved category of which so far only 2 billion tonnes has been extracted. The hiatus between the available geological and extractable/extracted resources is too large to be ignored.

iii.                                        States like West Bengal, largely dependent on coal for thermal power generation, may get left out if competitive bidding is resorted for allocating coal blocks.

iv.                                       The financial strength of highest bidder would tilt the allocation process in favour of large companies. This would contravene the need for equity in allocation to small and medium producers, whose dependence on fuel supply linkage through public sector utilities would only grow.  The ground experience of poor qualitative and quantitative delivery management by these utilities especially after introduction of New Coal Distribution Policy 2008 is, however, not very encouraging.

v.                                         Despite abundance of coal resources in West Bengal, the state is totally dependent on coal allocation/ linkage of fuel supply by the union coal ministry for its upcoming new steel projects and ongoing power projects.  For both, its coal requirements can be easily met from existing reserves if the state is delegated the power of allocation of Coal Blocks located within its geographical boundaries. Such a step would not only save considerable money and time involved in allocation, but also substantially cut down the gestation period of these capital-intensive projects. Likewise, such decision for the power projects, whose fuel supply linkage is currently being met partly from ECL coalfields and partly from outside West Bengal, would end the criss-cross movement of coal, besides huge logistics operations for rail-road movement, rake availability and supply chain sustenance.

vi.                                       Production of steel, cement and sponge iron requires higher grade of coal with some specific properties while for power generation any kind of coal can be used. Sub-optimal utilisation of higher grade of coal in the competitive bidding process cannot be ruled out.

vii.                                     The Standing Committee has rightly highlighted the need for creation of Area Development Authorities for improving the community welfare and peripheral development in the mining areas through a special Local Coal Area Development Authority. Earmarking of funds for this purpose alone would leave the essential area of social development untouched by the highest bidder, as his priority would be to focus on maximum extraction in the mining area and maximum attention to end-use site.

viii.                                   The experience hitherto gained in captive mining allocation to private end-use projects does not evoke enough confidence that scaling-up of the process would accelerate the two processes of coal mining with commissioning of end-use project in a concomitant and time-bound manner.

It is necessary to mention that the government of India allocated to the WBMDTC only 6 Coal Blocks from  January  2005 to December 2007 under State dispensation/ government company route despite repeated request of the state government to allocate 20 Coal Blocks for meeting the industrial requirements of the state. 

Further, in response to the DO letter No. F-01/447 dated 7th November 2009 of the minister-in-charge of the Department of Commerce & Industries, government of West Bengal, the minister of state (independent charge) of coal, government of India, vide his DO letter No. 38036/1/2009-CA-I dated 20th November 2009 intimated that “at present there is no proposal for allocation of Coal Blocks either through government company dispensation route or Screening Committee route under consideration of the ministry.” In response to DO letter No. F-01/AD-533 dated 11th November 2009 of the minister-in-charge, Commerce & Industries Department, Govt of West Bengal, the union minister for  coal vide his DO letter No. 38036/1/2009-CA-I dated 17th December 2009 the views communicated were no different.

The state government of West Bengal had, however, been persistent in its efforts for  having the Coal Blocks allocated through State dispensation/ government company route from the beginning. In his DO letter No. F-01/196 dated 29th March 2010 to the union minister for coal,  the minister-in-charge, Commerce and Industries, Govt of West Bengal  reiterated the same stand but to no avail. The fact, however, remains that the state government of West Bengal had never opposed competitive bidding. What it has always insisted upon is that the ‘State dispensation route/government company’ route should not be bartered away to the private companies in the interests of the states.

People's Democracy, September 02, 2012

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Memorandum Submitted to The Prime Minister By the Left Front Committee, West Bengal on August 25, 2011

Dr. Mammohan Singh
Hon’ble Prime Minister
Government of India
South Block, Raisina Hill
New Delhi 110 101

Dear Prime Minister,

At the very outset, we would like to thank you for sparing some of your valuable time from your busy schedule and having agreed to meet the delegation as undersigned.

We have met the Hon’ble Governor of West Bengal on 16.05.2011 and on 12.08.2011 to apprise him of the reign of terror unleashed by All India Trinamul Congress (AITC) following the declaration of the last Assembly Election results in West Bengal. In this connection, a delegation from the Left Front Legislature party in West Bengal also met the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 03.06.2011. Since then, the Leader of the Opposition has written six letters to the Chief Minister which proved abortive as there has been escalation of terror and violent attacks in the State.

We are fully aware that the Law & Order as presently prevailing in the State is primarily under the jurisdiction of the State Government. However, in the background of recent developments of the Left Wing Extremists’ (LWEs) affected areas in the southern part of the State and in the Hills, Dooars, Terrai and adjoining areas in North Bengal, the present state of unrest distrust exist among the different linguistic people are jeopardising the spirit and unity, integrity and harmony in these sensitive area. We firmly believe that the Union Government can not afford to be a silent spectator in a situation like this.

The Left Front Government, when it was in office, fully agreed with your assessment of the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) as the greatest danger to the internal security of the country. There had been remarkable success in confronting this menace by the co-ordinated actions of the Central and State Governments by successful use of the joint forces. Unfortunately, the new Government in the State has completely reversed this stand, thereby giving the LWEs a freehand to regroup and expand their area of operation much beyond what had existed ever before. The State Administration, while keeping the joint forces idle, has concentrated its offensive against the leaders and workers of CPI(M) in particular and those of the Left Front parties in general, who had been at the fore-front of the political, ideological and developmental process, in a word, multiform battle against the self-styled “Maoist”. Even the present ruling parties of the State are unable to carry out their political activities in those areas. Even the adjoining States have complained against the inaction of the West Bengal Government in this regard.

The way the tripartite agreement has been signed on the problems of the Hills keeping the opposition and, we believe, the PCC in West Bengal, in dark, will further complicate the situation there. Keeping on record the demand of Gorkha Jana Mukti Morcha (GJMM) for a separate State of ‘Gorkhaland’ and opening a Pandora’s Box by providing a High Power Committee to explore the possibilities for inclusion of new areas, from Dooars, Terrai and Plains in the proposed Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA). These are clear departures from the understanding arrived at the tripartite meetings held when the Left Front Government was in the office. We believe, you will agree, that this will lead to discontent, particularly among the tribal and other people of the Dooars, Terrai and Plains and resultantly will destabilize the situation in these sensitive areas. In view of the situation which has developed there may be threat to the security of the country.

In the situation stated above we are compelled to seek redressal of our grievances from your honour. A complied report of Post-poll violence unleashed on the Left in this State as on 15.08.2011 is annexed herewith for your kind perusal and necessary intervention. As summary of this report reveals that 30 Left Front leaders and workers [CPI(M) : 28, RSP : 2] have been killed and 7 more were abetted to commit suicide during this period; 684 women were assaulted physically, 508 molested and 23 raped; 3785 persons had to be hospitalized for the treatment of injuries suffered by them and many more were forced not to lodge complaint and seek hospital treatment. There had been 2064 number of arson and looting of houses and 14081 persons were evicted from their place of living. Around 40,000 in total had to leave their home under threat. To buy peace and stay in their home, people have been forced to pay money to the local AITC leaders and workers. According to a conservative estimate, total extortion amount thus paid might exceed Rs. 277.7 million. 758 Party, Trade Union and other Mass Organisation offices were either attacked, ransacked, burnt, forced to close or captured. 77 Student Union offices have been captured. Their office-bearers have been driven out, some of them forced to resign and even others denied to appear for their Exams. There has been a widespread attack on the rights of the peasantry where by 3418 Ryots were denied the right to cultivate their own lands amounting 9222.73 acres. Besides 26838 number of Patta holders and Share croppers have been forcibly evicted from 9222.02 acres of Patta and Barga lands. While Maoist and KLO militants are promised to be released as political prisoners, thousands of Left Front activists have been implicated in false cases on fabricated grounds including those instituted on the plea of so-called recovery of arms. Even the Left Party organs have not been spared. 241 Boards displaying Ganashakti daily in public have been dismantled and thousands of its copies have been burnt and the hawkers have been beaten up in order to disrupt its circulation chain.

All democratic institutions, the Panchayats, Municipalities, Co-operatives, different elected bodies of educational institutions have been made defunct either by attacks, intimidations or Government fiats. Even in certain areas teachers, non-teaching staffs and students are not allowed to enter their institutions.

The State is in unrest. The districts affected by the terror unleashed by AITC, the Jangalmahal now made a sanctuary for the ‘Maoists’, the mounting tension in the Hills, Terrai, Dooars and the adjoining plain in the North are glaring examples. Basic democratic rights of all sections of the people of the state are under threat. Even the INC, the partner of the ruling coalition, is not spared from these attacks. Even armed conflicts between the different factions of AITC are taking place. Anarchy has come to prevail over the rule of law. People of the state can not be expected to remain a silent spectator in this situation for long.

We sincerely request you to take immediate remedial measures to restore peace and normalcy in the State.



With regards,

Yours truly,

Biman Basu
Chairman
Left Front Committee, West Bengal

Left Front Parties

1. Communist Party of India (Marxist)
2. All India Forward Block
3. Revolutionary Socialist Party
4. Communist Party of India
5. Samajwadi Party
6. Democratic Socialist Party
7. Marxist Forward Block
8. Revolutionary Communist Party of India
9. Biplabi Bangla Congress
10. Workers’ Party

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Memorandum To The Prime Minister From The Left Front Legislature Party, West Bengal

Kolkata, August 22, 2011


Dr. Manmohan Singh
Hon’ble Prime Minister
Government of India
New Delhi

Dear Prime Minister,

We are thankful to you for sparing your scarce time for this interaction with us.

In this Memorandum, we begin by emphasising the urgent need for reordering – need for justified decentralisation – in the Centre-State relations in general terms and then specially for a State like West Bengal. We, then, highlight some of the major issues concerning the common people of West Bengal, where action from the national level would be essential.

1. Centre-State Relations

1.1 It is well known that there has been a long-prevailing problem of centralisation of resources in financial sphere in the hands of Government of India and inadequacy of resources in the States in relation to their developmental and administrative needs. This centralisation, and resulting imbalance, has arisen out of the fact that while on the one hand, in the Constitution, the major responsibilities in the sphere of development expenditure (for instance, on irrigation, roads, power, education, health, etc.) and administrative expenditure (for instance, on law and order, general administration, etc.) have been given to the States, the more important powers of revenue-raising (Income Tax, Corporate Tax, Union Excise Duty, Customs Duty, Service Tax, etc.) have, on the other hand, remained concentrated in the hands of Centre. In consequence, of the total revenue collected in the country in a year, nearly two-thirds get raised in the Centre and remaining one-third in all the States taken together. In order to correct this imbalance, all the States, and specially West Bengal, made representation before the Thirteenth Finance Commission that there is an essential need for enhancing transfer of resources from the Centre to the States, and that Constitutional propriety (in terms of Articles 280 and 275) requires that this enhanced transfer should be made in terms of increasing the share of gross Central Taxes to the States and in terms of appropriate increase in grants-in-aid, and not in terms of discretionary transfer by unfair use of Article 282, through Centrally Sponsored Schemes with rigid centralised guidelines even pertaining to the State subjects, and without taking care of special characteristics of each State. All the States had strongly urged, on the basis of hard data, for increasing the share of Central taxes from 30.5 per cent to 50 per cent.

1.2 The States have also strongly demanded for redressal of their debt burden, particularly when such debts are related to certain Central decisions. In the case of West Bengal, of the total debt burden of Rs. 1.86 lakh crore at the end of 2010-11, nearly Rs. 79 thousand crore is linked to small savings which is a Central programme, with the condition that at least 80 per cent of net small savings collection in a year in the State will be categorised as loan burden on the State Government. Since small saving by people in West Bengal is the highest among the States, the loan burden for the State Government on this account, because of the Centre’s condition, has become specially high without the State Government being directly responsible for it. The Left Front Government of West Bengal, while urging for debt relief, had correctly demanded a special relief for small savings related debt burden.

1.3 The Left Front Government of West Bengal had also raised the constitutionally valid demand for the payment of coal royalty with arrears at revised rate. It is well known that all the States are constitutionally entitled to levy both cess on coal-bearing land and royalty on coal by virtue of Entry 49 and Entry 50 respectively of the State list. In the case of royalty on coal, rates of royalty are fixed by the Central Government in terms of Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957. Moreover, the Constitutional validity of collection of both coal royalty and cess on coal-bearing land by the Government of West Bengal has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (2004). Despite that, the State of West Bengal has been discriminatingly denied benefits of revision of coal royalty rates since 1991, causing a loss of revenue in arrears of about Rs. 5,000 crore now. Although it is not Constitutionally required, yet the Government of West Bengal had communicated to Government of India that if the State is compensated for the loss of arrear revenue on coal royalty of Rs. 5,000 crore, the rate of cess on coal would be appropriately reduced so that the current payment of coal cess and coal royalty together would not have any adverse effect on coal prices. This demand was also placed before the Thirteenth Finance Commission.

1.4 Recommendations of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, however, have belied the justified expectation of the States, and have gone in the opposite direction. In the recommendation, while the share of Central taxes for the States has only been insignificantly increased from 30.5 per cent to 32 per cent, there has been a proliferation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes with discretionary transfer with rigid conditionalities, asking the States to reallocate their budgetary resources to meet the States’ share for such schemes and intruding into the limited fiscal space of the State Governments. Debt relief recommended has also been inadequate, particularly for the small saving related debt burden for States like West Bengal. The justified demand of West Bengal for payment of coal royalty at revised rates has again been left unattended.

1.5 Confronted with this situation, we strongly demand for increasing the States’ share of Central taxes to 50 per cent as soon as possible and in appropriate manner. It is further urged upon the Government of India that funds in Centrally Sponsored Schemes in the State subjects be transferred to the States, without rigid centralised conditions and with the overall objectives jointly agreed to by the Centre and the States and regular joint review of the Planning Commission and the States. We again strongly demand a comprehensive debt relief for loans linked to small savings and a positive decision for West Bengal on the constitutionally justified payment of coal royalty at revised rates.

1.6 We are seriously worried about the recent activities of certain financial companies in West Bengal. These companies have reportedly registered themselves under some Central authorities such as SEBI under Union Finance Ministry or Registrar of Companies under the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs, collected deposits from the common people, with alluring but unrealisable returns, and invested the deposited money violating grossly the guidelines of the Central agencies. We urgently demand that a comprehensive enquiry be conducted by the Government of India and necessary action taken without any loss of time for protecting the interests of depositors. Some of these companies are under the jurisdiction of Reserve Bank of India. Monitoring and disciplinary actions by the Reserve Bank of India should also be made more comprehensive and expeditious.


2. Problem of Price Rise

2.1 The continuous rise in prices, particularly of food items, is a matter of serious concern for people of West Bengal as well as for people of the entire country. Price-rise is indeed a national level problem with manifestation in every State. In our view, the major causes behind this price-rise have been sluggish growth in agriculture, monopolistic/oligopolistic role of big traders, lack of a comprehensive public distribution system in essential items, frequent and sharp increase in prices of petroleum products, forward trading in commodities and inadequate coordination between Centre and the States in enforcing regulatory control.

2.2 We, therefore, demand that for controlling the price-rise, along with ensuring steady growth in agriculture for the country, it is essential to introduce from the national level, and in coordination with the States, a comprehensive and universal public distribution system, instead of the present truncated and targeted public distribution system in essential commodities, with appropriate subsidy, to provide protection to common people from ravages of inflation and also to work as a countervailing force against the monopolistic powers in the market for controlling price-rise itself, transparent review of mechanism of fixation of petroleum product prices, withdrawal of forward trading and foreign direct investment in retail trade, and finally joint regulatory actions by the Centre and the States against hoarding etc., and making results of such monitoring public every month. We also consider that the present policy of indiscriminate increase in the interest rate on bank loans would discourage growth of production and supply, and would itself cause a cost-push element in enhancing inflation. We are of the view that this policy should be reviewed.

3. Problem of Unemployment

3.1 Along with price-rise, unemployment is also a national-level problem with its manifestation in every State. In order to correctly redress this problem, it should be appropriate to state the national objective in terms of employment-oriented growth, and not simply in terms of growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In this objective of employment-oriented growth, emphasis should be placed on such growth in output in agriculture, industry and services that will also bring about adequate generation of regular employment, with addition of employment exceeding addition of labour force, thus causing a reduction in the backlog of employment. Such an approach from the national-level should be broken down with targets for employment-oriented growth for each State along with sector-wise activities. In these activities, a special emphasis should be given for SC, ST, OBC people, minorities and women as well as for disadvantageous regions.

3.2 Along with this change in the basic approach, we also demand that in the line of MGNREGS, a National Urban Employment Guarantee Scheme should be considered for urban areas as well. It may be mentioned that in West Bengal, the Left Front Government introduced a State-level urban employment scheme (called West Bengal State Urban Employment Programme) in 2010-11 with budgetary provision of Rs. 250 crore for the year. A national-level urban employment programme with enhanced Central budgetary provision would be specially useful.

4. Agriculture: Irrigation, Other Inputs, Bank Credit, etc.

4.1 Keeping in view this priority of employment-oriented growth and also the need for price-control, there is a need to adopt policy measures in agriculture from the national level, in coordination with the States, for enhancing agricultural production and yield rate on a sustainable basis. To this end, not only self-sufficiency in overall food grains production should be achieved and maintained, but the demand-supply gap in specific food grains, oil seeds, pulses and other items, should also be systematically reduced over the period of next five years. For making this entire exercise socially sustainable, it should also be integrated with the objective of generation of adequate employment and incomes for the common farmers by providing special incentive for aforesaid items.

4.2 It order to form an idea of the Government investment required for attainting these objectives, an exercise was carefully worked out for West Bengal by the Left Front Government in 2010-11 and presented before the Working Group of Chief Ministers set up after the meeting of Prime Minister with the Chief Ministers in 2010-11. Beginning with land reforms, and then supporting land reforms by spread of irrigation (with about 72 per cent of the net agricultural area in the State under potential irrigation coverage achieved by 2009-10), and other non-land inputs, such as improved seeds (nearly 98 per cent coverage reached in paddy production) and a mix of chemical, organic and bio-fertilisers, the State could attain a rate of growth in State Domestic Product from agriculture at 4.3 per cent, and growth of yield rate of food grains of 2.0 per cent in 2009-10, and the position of West Bengal became first in production of rice as well as vegetables among all the States.

4.3 After achieving this stage of development in agricultural production, yield rate, in irrigation and in the use of seeds and fertilisers, the targets for West Bengal were fixed in 2010-11 for the next five years for annual rate of growth of agricultural production at 4.5 per cent, growth of yield rate at 3.1 per cent and that of cropping intensity at 1.4 per cent, so that self-sufficiency could be attained in total food grains production at the end of 2011-12, and demand-supply gap in case of wheat, pulses and oilseeds could be significantly reduced at the end of 2013-14. The correlated target of employment generation from agriculture and allied sectors was also fixed.

4.4 For achieving these targets in West Bengal, it was considered necessary to increase the proportion of net irrigated area to net agriculture area to at least 85 per cent by the end of 2013-14. To this end, along with fully developing the potential of minor irrigation projects, there is a critical need for expeditious completion of national level Teesta Project, speedy implementation of Subarnarekha Project, prevention of erosion of international and national level rivers, such as Ganga-Padma and Bhagirathi as well as coastal erosion, adequate national level attention to basin specific drainage schemes (such as for Keleghai-Kapaleswari-Baghai basin, Kandi area, Ghatal area and Ichhamati river) the lower DVC embankment improvement and also desiltation of important water reservoir under the DVC, Mayurakshi and Kangsabati Projects. Consistent with this overall strategy, it was also presented before this Working Group of Chief Ministers that there would be requirement of 100 per cent coverage of improved variety of seeds, setting up of a seed village in at least every third village and a bio-village in every fifth village of the State within 2013-14.

We urge for early action in terms of required Central support in each of these areas related to agriculture.

4.5 Along with these measures, adequate and timely availability of credit from the banking system is also essential. On the basis of Date Committee formula, the credit need for agriculture and allied activities in West Bengal has been assessed at Rs. 45,000 crore per year. However, as against this requirement, actual disbursement of agricultural credit in West Bengal has been only Rs. 11,555 crore in 2010-11, although credit disbursement in agriculture in some of the comparable States, with total bank deposit less than in West Bengal, has been more than Rs. 40,000 crore in 2010-11. We demand that this discrimination against West Bengal in the sphere of agricultural credit should be removed and annual disbursement of agricultural credit should be raised above Rs. 40,000 crore as soon as possible. Along with the credit disbursement, there should also not be any slippage in the achievement of target of opening up of at least one branch for every village (with population of at least 2000) by the financial year, 2011-12.

5. Industry

5.1 In the sphere of industry, justified needs of West Bengal should be carefully attended from the national level. Due to concessions given from the national level in terms of Central taxes for certain regions, the State of West Bengal, particularly the districts in North Bengal have been adversely affected. Either these concessions should be substituted by adequate direct Central grants in terms of infrastructure or other facilities, or till such time as these concessions are accorded, similar benefit should be extended at least for the districts of North Bengal.

5.2 Keeping in view the growth impulses in agriculture, pisciculture, horticulture and animal resources in West Bengal, a special Central promotional support for development of agro-industry in the State should be seriously considered. Similarly, for reasons of eco-friendly nature of jute, a comprehensive revival package for jute industry, with specific assistance for diversification will help rejuvenate the jute industry. The augmentation of Central support, along with the State assistance, will help the tea industry turn around adequately. Within the limitations at the State level, the Left Front Government took specific steps for revival of closed and sick industries units, particularly by granting subsidy, tax relief etc. as a part of revival package. Support of the Central Government through the banking sector would strengthen this process of revival of sick and closed units in the State.

5.3 For reasons of employment generation, a special emphasis should be placed on the development of medium and small industries as well as self-help groups (SHGs). According to the latest National Sample Survey data (2005-06) on unorganised manufacturing sector, both in respect of the number of running units (27.53 lakh) and generation of employment (54.93 lakh), West Bengal has been ranked in the first position among the States. Moreover, the number of SHGs has now exceeded 12 lakh, with more than 90 per cent comprising of women-led SHGs having excellent repayment record. The Centre-State joint promotional assistance required for the SME sector and SHGs would call for, apart from support in providing appropriate technology and market facilities, adequate and timely disbursement of loan from the banking sector. Leaders of some of the SHGs, with adequate training provided by NABARD, should be chosen by the banks as “Business Correspondents” more adequately, as was suggested by the State Government in 2009-10 and also accepted by the Reserve Bank of India in its guidelines.

5.4 A comprehensive and targeted Centre-State assistance package should be introduced for growth of employment-intensive handloom sector. In the line of reform measures introduced for both short-term and long-term cooperative credit institutions from the national level in coordination with the States, revival package for cooperative institutions in the handloom sector should also be considered by the Government of India.

6. Infrastructure

6.1 In the irrigation sector, need for Central support has already been highlighted earlier in Section 4. In the road sector, it is important to emphasise the fact that due to the unique geographical location, West Bengal serves as the national transit corridor for all the north-eastern States and also for export to adjacent countries. Keeping in view the significance of this national level road linkage, Government of West Bengal has placed in its Memorandum to the Thirteenth Finance Commission (2008) the need for upgradation of several State Highways to the level of National Highways. This need, however, was not duly accommodated in the recommendations of the Thirteenth Finance Commission. We now strongly urge upon the Government of India to reconsider, in the national interest, the entire matter of upgradation of deserving State Highways of West Bengal to the status of National Highways, and provide adequate Central budgetary support for this upgradation as well as for improved and timely maintenance of existing National Highways. A similarly forcussed attention from the national level is also necessary not only for Kolkata Port and Haldia Port, but also for setting up of deep sea port at Sagar Island. In the sphere of railways, in view of the increase in railway accidents in the State in recent years, an urgent attention should also be given for ensuring safety measures for preventing such accidents.

7. Social Sector

7.1 In the sphere of public health, in the vital matters relating to death rate and infant mortality rate, there has been improvement over the last decade in the performance of health sector in the State, with the death rate in West Bengal, according to the State-wise data published by the Government of India (2009), falling to 6.2 per thousand which is not only lower than the all-India average (7.3) but also the lowest among all the major States, and also a noticeable fall in infant mortality rate to 33 per thousand as against the all-India average of 50. In this background, it will appropriate if, along with the Central funds for preventive and primary health care, more adequate Central funds are provided for tertiary health care, particularly for development and extension of teaching hospitals in the State. The long standing demand of the State for setting up an All India Institute of Medical Science ( AIIMS) is yet to be realized inspite of the decision taken by the UPA-I Government. This must be taken up immediately.

7.2 In the sphere of education, augmentation of Central support for expansion of vocational and technical education would be specially helpful in the interest of employment generation.

7.3 Within the overall objective of employment generation and growth, a further focussed attention is needed for providing additional Central support for welfare of backward classes, women and child care and welfare of minorities. In this context, along with adoption of sub plan approach for schemes on welfare of backward classes and women and child care, similar sub plan approach, or at least certain earmarking approach should also be adopted from the national level for emphasising the importance of welfare of minorities. This issue was raised by the State Government in its discussion with the Planning Commission in 2009-10.

7.4 In the sphere of social sector as well as for the objective of employment generation with related activity in agriculture, industry, services and infrastructure, a special Central support would be necessary for the disadvantage regions in North Bengal, Sundarban Area and Western part of the State.

8. Resource Mobilisation

For the Central support in the important spheres mentioned above, there will be need for additional financial resources. It is in this context that the introduction of Value Added Tax (VAT) in the States has opened up a new opportunity to coordinate taxation data base between the Centre and the States. The value addition from production and trade is, under certain condition, identically equal to the sum total of generation of incomes, and therefore there should be a close correspondence between the VAT returns and income tax returns. If the taxation data of the Centre are correctly coordinated with the taxation data of the States, then that will be a unique and effective way of unearthing the tax-evaded black money. If this tax-evaded money is duly unearthed, then the revenue gains for the Central Government should be significant, which would help the Centre in providing the additional financial support in the spheres mentioned above.

This is an illustrative but not exhaustive account of some of the issues involved. We would request for a response on the issues raised above from your end at an early date.

With regards,
Yours sincerely,

Sd/- Dr. Surjya Kanta Mishra
Leader of the Opposition
West Bengal Legislative Assembly

Sd/- Subhas Naskar- RSP
Dy. Leader

Sd/-Abdur Rezzak Mollah - CPI (M)

Sd/-Paresh Adhikary - AIFB

Sd/-Anandamoy Mondal – CPI

Sd/-Prabodh Chandra Sinha – DSP

Sd/-Chand Mohammad - Samjwadi Party



Press Release

Monday, April 25, 2011

Buddhadeb surprised at Manmohan's remarks

Staff Reporter

THE HINDU, KOLKATA, April 25, 2011

West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee expressed surprise on Sunday over Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's comments at an election rally on Saturday, particularly his remarks that Gujarat ranks higher than West Bengal in ensuring jobs for Muslims.


“I am surprised by his [Dr. Singh's] comments yesterday,” Mr. Bhattacharjee said adding that he had met the Prime Minister on several occasions in New Delhi and “non-performance” of the Left Front government had never come up.


Mr. Bhattacharjee said Dr. Singh's comparisons between the condition of Muslims in West Bengal and Gujarat were “not expected of him” because “Muslims in West Bengal were living in peace and harmony whereas in Gujarat, they live in fear.”


Better literacy rate


On Dr. Singh's claims about the educational and cultural backwardness of the State, Mr. Bhattacharjee reiterated that the literacy rate in the State was more than 77 per cent, against the national average of about 74 per cent.


However, when asked if the Prime Minister had succumbed to the pressure of coalition politics, Mr. Bhattacharjee said he would not like to criticise him over it as it was “usual” that Dr. Singh should address a public rally here and “speak against the government” at a time when the elections were on.


When it was pointed out that in his speech, the Prime Minister made no mention of Maoists, Mr. Bhattacharjee said: “He has not spoken a word on price rise, on the numerous corruption cases in the Centre or the Maoist problem in the State. He has not spoken on many issues. But, how is it possible to comment on something that he has not said?”


Mr. Bhattacharjee said there were other matters on which the Prime Minister “was unhappy,” but had found no mention in his speech, including the fact that no progress was made on the dedicated freight corridor project here or the developments that took place at Singur.


Yet, when asked if he had a message for the Prime Minister, Mr. Bhattacharjee said: “He is our Prime Minister. He is doing his job, I'm doing mine.”


On being reminded that it was Dr. Singh who once described Mr. Bhattacharjee as the nation's best Chief Minister, Mr. Bhattacharjee shrugged it off saying, “what the prime Minister may have said at some point in time or when he changed his mind, I am not aware.”


“Eventually, it is the people's opinion about me that matters,” he said.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Left leader Memorandum to PM : Irresponsible and dangerous moves of the Railways Minister




New Delhi, December 4: Following is the memorandum given to PM by the leaders of Left parties -- Sitaram Yechury, Basudeb Acharia, Shyamal Chakraborty, Prabodh Panda, Manohar Tirki, Barun Mukherjee.




December 4th 2009


Dr. Manmohan Singh
Hon’ble Prime Minister of India
New Delhi


Sub: Irresponsible and dangerous moves of the Railways Minister





Dear Prime Minister,




1. You have called the ‘Maoists’ the greatest internal threat to the security of the country, and yet, the Railway minister has kept providing these elements with her full fledged support in the media and through her declarations and acts. She has also repeatedly called for the release of Chhatradhar Mahato, named accused in murder cases. The Railway minister is constantly demanding the withdrawal of Joint Forces from West Bengal, which will only facilitate the activities of the Maoists. Within hours of a landmine blast in West Midnapore on 27.11.2009 which killed two policemen, the Railway Minister denigrated the Joint Forces.



2. The said minister has claimed before the media inter alia that the violence being committed on and against the leaders and workers of the CPI(M) is not the handiwork of the CPI(Maoist) but a result of internecine feud. She has called for the arrest of the Bengal Chief Minister and in the same breath the release of Chhatradhar Mahato while repeatedly calling also for application of ART 355 and 356 in Bengal. The ‘Maoists’ receive a moral boost from her declarations and deeds And almost simultaneously the Maoist Leader Kishanji reciprocated by airing his loud suggestions that the present Railway Minister should be the Chief Minister of West Bengal.



3. The annexed copies of the media reports would make it clear, the AITC and the CPI(Maoist), have long been engaged in destabilising the political situation of the state by means of assassination, mayhem, arson, committing crimes on women and generally seeking to create a situation where the democratic fabric of the state in put under great duress. The Maoist along with AITC activists are forcing people at gunpoint to join their rally and barricades.



4. Annexure I A, B, and C provide a detailed list of the leaders and workers of the CPI(M) and Left Front assassinated by the Maoist and the people’s War Group (PWG) from 2001. The number of those killed from June 2006 itself is 326. The ‘Maoists’ and the AITC have also killed, scores of common men, women, children, as well as police and medical personnel.



5. The AITC leadership is a close patron of the leadership of the People’s Committee against Police Atrocities (PCAPA), and its supremo Chhatradhar Mahato. Annexure II A, B, and C provide examples of this state-of-affairs from media reports.



6. Annexure III in the form of a CD contains photos that show the Railway Minister, Chhatradhar Mahato, and a section of the intelligentsia in confabulation in the area of Lalgarh, which has been a ‘Maoist’ stronghold. The PCAPA is nothing but a mass front of the CPI (Maoist) as reports in the media have repeatedly noted.



7. We draw your attention to the recent declaration of the ‘Maoist’ leader ‘Kishanji’ that since they have provided support to the AITC at Nandigram against the CPI(M), the AITC should come forward and help them at Lalgarh and adjacent areas.



8. The most recent incident of the blockade of the Rajdhani Express exposes the AITC game plan further. Even as the blockade was going on and graffiti being painted on the sides of the bogies calling for the release of Chhatradhar Mahato who is presently in police custody, the railways minister blamed the ‘Marxists’, meaning the CPI(M) that has held the train up. To add insult to injury, a full 24 hours earlier to the blockade, an AITC central minister Shri Sisir Adhikari had claimed before the media that he ‘knew that the blockade would take place.’ The source of ‘knowledge’ of this minister may kindly be probed and the nation kept informed.



9. At a time when the ‘Maoists’ have laid claim to the murder of an AITC worker Nishikanta Mondal at Nandigram on 22 September 2009, the Railway Minister keeps harping on the untruth that he was ‘killed by the CPI(M).’ On 29.11.2009, she has also said that she was privy to clues of the murder.



10. We enclose as Annexure II A and B the English translation of what has appeared in the Bengali print media on the nexus between the AITC-PCAPA-‘Maoists’ and as Annexure IV we enclose the original reports in Bengali that has appeared in the Bengali print media.



11. We urge upon you to take appropriate implicational notice of the developments.




Thanking you,


Yours sincerely,

............................

From India News Network (INN)